Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries Towards a New Approach in the WTO*
نویسنده
چکیده
* The views expressed in this paper are personal and should not be attributed to any of the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Summary This paper discusses options that could be considered in the WTO to provide more favorable—so-called special and differential treatment (SDT)—to small and low-income countries. We argue that SDT should be limited to countries that most need it and that there is therefore a need for differentiation across WTO members, but also that a number of additional steps are needed which would benefit all developing countries. We suggest the following to make SDT more effective and the Doha Round more supportive of development: • A binding commitment by developed countries to abolish export subsidies and NTBs (tariff quotas) and to reduce MFN tariffs on labor-intensive products of export interest to developing countries to no more than 5 percent in 2010, and to no more than 10 percent for agricultural products. All tariffs on manufactures should go to zero by 2015, the target date for the achievement of the MDGs. Liberalization should also extend to developing countries, on the basis of a formula approach. • A binding commitment by developed countries on services to expand temporary access for service providers by a specific amount—e.g., equal to 3 percent of the workforce—and not to restrict cross-border trade (e.g., via telecom channels). • Unilateral action by developed countries to extend preferential market access for LDCs and similar small and low income countries and to simplify eligibility criteria, especially rules of origin upon the conclusion of the Doha negotiations. • Affirmation by the WTO that core disciplines relating to the use of trade policy apply equally to all WTO members • Acceptance of the principle that for small and low income countries 'one size does not fit all' when it comes to domestic regulation and to WTO agreements requiring substantial investment of resources. • Recognition that some WTO agreements need to be adapted to make them more supportive of development, and a consequent willingness to renegotiate these. • Expansion of development assistance to bolster trade capacity in poor countries and strengthening of the linkages between trade-related technical assistance and the mechanisms through which aid priorities are determined in developing countries In practice, calls for specific types of SDT often appear to be motivated by a perception that a certain WTO rule is 'anti-development' and that therefore developing countries should …
منابع مشابه
Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
This paper examines the case for special and differential (S&D) treatment for developing countries within the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and the particular instruments or exemptions it should cover. The S&D treatment currently allowed to developing countries in the Agreement and the use they have made of it is first described. The range of proposals put forward by developing countries (and by...
متن کاملCancún: Crisis or Catharsis?
During September 10-14, 2003, WTO members met in Cancún for a mid-term review of the Doha Round of trade negotiations, launched in November 2001. Trade ministers entered the 5 WTO Ministerial divided on agricultural and non-agricultural negotiating modalities, on whether to launch negotiations on the so-called Singapore issues and their possible scope, on the approach to take towards strengthen...
متن کاملMultilateralism after the Failure of the DDR and Climate Change Negotiations
This paper examines the two most important current efforts to devise new rules binding all nations the negotiations in the WTO of trade rules and the negotiations under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to devise rules restricting the annual emissions of greenhouse gases. Both negotiations have failed after several years of intensive effort. There are remarkable parallels in these ...
متن کاملSpecial and Differential Treatment in the Wto: Why, When and How?
Special and differential treatment (S&D) for developing countries continues to be a defining feature of the multilateral trading system. This paper seeks to address key aspects of what has become an increasingly entangled and multi-faceted discussion. The paper begins by reviewing the historical context in which the relationship of developing countries with the multilateral trading system evolv...
متن کاملChallenges facing UNCTAD in the International Trade Trends: Before and After the Cold War
The article depicts the situation before Cold War in which developing countries (DCs) and least Developed countries (LDCs) found themselves big loser, as they were deprived from participation in trade negotiation process, leading into establishment of GATT . Therefore, they resorted to UNCTAD as the sole defender of their interests against Developed Countries in trade negotiations. UNCTAD has ...
متن کامل